aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* Basic location checking test.Ted Gould2010-01-151-0/+18
|
* Full signal handlers so that we can see everything.Ted Gould2009-12-031-4/+6
|
* Merge in from trunk, now two failing tests.Ted Gould2009-12-024-5/+113
|\
| * Adding a test to ensure that a service gets shutdown by someone unwatching it.Ted Gould2009-12-013-0/+91
| |
| * Checking to make sure we don't get connected twice, that'd be an error.Ted Gould2009-12-011-0/+14
| |
| * Updating connection prototype to get all the data.Ted Gould2009-12-011-2/+2
| |
| * Making the timeout a failure case, and making it so that we want a graceful ↵Ted Gould2009-12-012-3/+5
| | | | | | | | shutdown.
* | Forgot to delete the programs.Ted Gould2009-12-021-5/+0
| |
* | Printing out the session bus addressTed Gould2009-12-021-1/+2
| |
* | Changing the names we're registering for to be correct.Ted Gould2009-12-022-2/+2
| |
* | Not erroring when we're supposed to pass.Ted Gould2009-12-022-2/+2
| |
* | Adding a new test to look at version numbers.Ted Gould2009-12-027-1/+236
|/
* Updating to current trunk.Ted Gould2009-11-047-5/+331
|\
| * Distcheck fixes. Looking for the files in the right place and making sure ↵Ted Gould2009-11-021-3/+3
| | | | | | | | we clean up after ourselves.
| * We should pass the test if we get a connection, it means we activated.Ted Gould2009-11-021-3/+3
| |
| * We want to not get the shutdown. Since we're testing that we get it without ↵Ted Gould2009-11-021-5/+5
| | | | | | | | connection we can now assume that if we don't get it we should pass.
| * Switching the name to match the service file... should fail.Ted Gould2009-11-021-1/+1
| |
| * Building a service file.Ted Gould2009-11-022-1/+7
| |
| * Adding in the basic data needed to start bringing up a test to start the ↵Ted Gould2009-11-024-1/+173
| | | | | | | | service.
| * Ah, we can't throw an error on success.Ted Gould2009-11-021-1/+2
| |
| * Adding a test that ensures we don't get a connect signal.Ted Gould2009-10-302-0/+70
| |
| * Oops, forgot to set to passed.Ted Gould2009-10-291-0/+1
| |
| * Woot! A failing test. Look how TDD I am.Ted Gould2009-10-291-0/+10
| |
| * Making the gtester stuff into a autotest thingy.Ted Gould2009-10-291-4/+9
| |
| * Creating a new test and linking it into things.Ted Gould2009-10-292-1/+62
| |
* | Adding a simple indicator test that checks to make sure we can signal up the ↵Ted Gould2009-11-042-2/+39
| | | | | | | | stack.
* | Building a dummy indicator that signals.Ted Gould2009-11-042-0/+130
| |
* | Having the test expect an object, but fail when calling the functions.Ted Gould2009-11-031-1/+3
| |
* | Make the tester dynamically link the lib so that there's not two versions of ↵Ted Gould2009-11-031-1/+3
| | | | | | | | everything.
* | Linking the indicators with the libindicator library.Ted Gould2009-11-031-3/+9
| |
* | Switching to checking the entires list instead of individual functions.Ted Gould2009-11-031-3/+1
| |
* | Converting the dummy indicators over to the new API. They compile now.Ted Gould2009-11-033-9/+150
|/
* using the blank dummy indicatorTed Gould2009-10-111-0/+9
|
* Building a new dummy indicator that doesn't have any symbols in it.Ted Gould2009-10-112-0/+25
|
* Testing the accessorsTed Gould2009-10-081-0/+16
|
* We need to use GTK.Ted Gould2009-10-081-1/+2
|
* A better dummy menu.Ted Gould2009-10-081-1/+6
|
* Create a very simple indicator and testing it.Ted Gould2009-10-083-3/+46
|
* Being a bit more verboseTed Gould2009-10-081-1/+1
|
* Making it so that the null test checks for failure as we shoudln't have a ↵Ted Gould2009-10-081-2/+12
| | | | null image and label. Also making it so that warnings don't cause the test to fail.
* Use the new build dir flagTed Gould2009-10-081-1/+1
|
* Build dir fix and making gtester run all of them even if one fails.Ted Gould2009-10-081-2/+3
|
* A test to load the dummy indicatorTed Gould2009-10-081-0/+18
|
* Apparently they have to be installable to get the .so. Fail.Ted Gould2009-10-081-1/+1
|
* Adding a test that should pass as given a bad filename we should get no ↵Ted Gould2009-10-081-0/+9
| | | | object back.
* Creating a dummy indicator that returns nullTed Gould2009-10-082-1/+53
|
* Using a weak ref instead of connecting to a signal that doesn't existTed Gould2009-10-081-2/+2
|
* Test to build the object and unref it.Ted Gould2009-10-081-0/+16
|
* Fleshing out the test a little bit.Ted Gould2009-10-082-4/+26
|
* Adding in a simple little test.Ted Gould2009-10-082-1/+31
|
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-01 01:28:39 +0000