aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Expand)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Make tests build under GTK+ 3Ted Gould2011-06-176-12/+25
* Various memory leaks and fixesTed Gould2011-06-172-55/+82
|\
| * Answering a TODOTed Gould2011-06-161-1/+2
| * Avoid string parsing by using a direct variant new function.Ted Gould2011-06-161-1/+1
| * Fix for several issues as documented in bug 784890Jonathan Landis2011-06-163-55/+83
* | Unsetting the property valueTed Gould2011-06-171-0/+3
|\ \
| * | Unset the value as specified in bug 785828Jonathan Landis2011-06-161-0/+3
| |/
* | Matching version number of 0.4 trunkTed Gould2011-06-161-2/+2
|\|
| * Fix to toggle visibility for EclipseTed Gould2011-05-311-0/+18
| |\
| * | 0.4.4Ted Gould2011-04-251-3/+3
* | | Making the default GTK 3Ted Gould2011-06-161-1/+1
* | | Add a more specific annotationTed Gould2011-06-161-1/+1
|\ \ \
| * | | Adding the element type to get_childrenTed Gould2011-05-131-1/+1
* | | | Toggle visibility to help EclipseTed Gould2011-05-311-0/+18
|\ \ \ \ | |/ / / |/| | / | | |/ | |/|
| * | ref menu until we're done toggling its visibilityMichael Terry2011-05-181-1/+3
| * | toggle visibility of menus to fix Eclipse RCP appsMichael Terry2011-04-271-0/+16
* | | Removing the serializable menuitemTed Gould2011-05-036-455/+3
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| |
| * | Removing the serializable menu item docsTed Gould2011-04-261-20/+0
| * | Dropping the serializable menu item. Not a bad idea, but we can do better.Ted Gould2011-04-265-435/+3
|/ /
* / Let's break us some ABITed Gould2011-04-261-2/+2
|/
* Fix a typo in the signal name to make it match the XML filesTed Gould2011-04-192-2/+2
|\
| * fix typo that prevented Qt apps from sending some property updatesMichael Terry2011-04-191-1/+1
* | Ref'ing the server for the entire time we're getting the busTed Gould2011-04-191-0/+3
|\ \ | |/ |/|
| * Referencing the server for as long as we're looking up the bus.Ted Gould2011-04-181-0/+3
|/
* Activating new entries the same as originally parsed onesTed Gould2011-04-151-24/+34
|\
| * refactor this branch a bit to rebase on trunkMichael Terry2011-04-151-29/+31
| * merge from trunkMichael Terry2011-04-151-23/+34
| |\ | |/ |/|
* | Only activate items if they have submenusTed Gould2011-04-151-0/+14
|\ \
| * | Oops, wrong object typeTed Gould2011-04-151-1/+1
| * | Only activate items that have submenusTed Gould2011-04-151-0/+14
* | | Make sure we watch new busmenus the same as original ones.Ted Gould2011-04-151-23/+20
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| |
| * | watch new submenus for additions and removalsMichael Terry2011-04-151-23/+20
|/ /
| * activate new toplevel menu itemsMichael Terry2011-04-151-0/+8
|/
* 0.4.3Ted Gould2011-04-141-3/+3
* Handle cases of labels being added laterTed Gould2011-04-121-13/+43
|\
| * watch empty/separator menu items for any added GtkLabel children, as gnome-co...Michael Terry2011-04-121-13/+43
* | Changing the cleanup of GTK Menuitems to avoid undefined references.Ted Gould2011-04-125-29/+24
|\ \
| * | Ensuring all the menus are hidden before unref'ing rootTed Gould2011-04-101-0/+14
| * | Passing the menuitem instead of finding it.Ted Gould2011-04-103-4/+4
| * | Protecting the label with the null check and don't unref something that shoul...Ted Gould2011-04-101-2/+1
| * | Attaching the data in a way that it'll cleanup itselfTed Gould2011-04-101-2/+3
| * | Attaching bugTed Gould2011-04-070-0/+0
| * | We have to destroy, why? Because we want to make sure that the menu having a...Ted Gould2011-04-071-1/+1
| * | Switching the reference to the GTK Menuitem to be a _sink as well as using se...Ted Gould2011-04-071-21/+2
| |/
* | Ensure that we gaurantee the open/clicked/closed event ordering.Ted Gould2011-04-121-8/+127
|\ \ | |/ |/|
| * guard against an activation that does not actually have an associated menu-hideMichael Terry2011-04-081-4/+26
| * force activated event to be sandwiched by opened/closed eventsMichael Terry2011-04-071-8/+105
|/
* 0.4.2Ted Gould2011-04-071-3/+3
* Build menus based on teh child-display propertyTed Gould2011-04-073-16/+49
|\
| * Make check to send about-to-show look for properties as well.Ted Gould2011-04-051-1/+1