aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* watch new submenus for additions and removalsMichael Terry2011-04-151-23/+20
|
* 0.4.3Ted Gould2011-04-141-3/+3
|
* Handle cases of labels being added laterTed Gould2011-04-121-13/+43
|\
| * watch empty/separator menu items for any added GtkLabel children, as ↵Michael Terry2011-04-121-13/+43
| | | | | | | | gnome-commander likes to do
* | Changing the cleanup of GTK Menuitems to avoid undefined references.Ted Gould2011-04-125-29/+24
|\ \
| * | Ensuring all the menus are hidden before unref'ing rootTed Gould2011-04-101-0/+14
| | |
| * | Passing the menuitem instead of finding it.Ted Gould2011-04-103-4/+4
| | |
| * | Protecting the label with the null check and don't unref something that ↵Ted Gould2011-04-101-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | shouldn't be.
| * | Attaching the data in a way that it'll cleanup itselfTed Gould2011-04-101-2/+3
| | |
| * | Attaching bugTed Gould2011-04-070-0/+0
| | |
| * | We have to destroy, why? Because we want to make sure that the menu having ↵Ted Gould2011-04-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | a ref doesn't block us from getting rid of the item.
| * | Switching the reference to the GTK Menuitem to be a _sink as well as using ↵Ted Gould2011-04-071-21/+2
| |/ | | | | | | set_data_full() instead of a weak ref for unref'ing it.
* | Ensure that we gaurantee the open/clicked/closed event ordering.Ted Gould2011-04-121-8/+127
|\ \ | |/ |/|
| * guard against an activation that does not actually have an associated menu-hideMichael Terry2011-04-081-4/+26
| |
| * force activated event to be sandwiched by opened/closed eventsMichael Terry2011-04-071-8/+105
|/
* 0.4.2Ted Gould2011-04-071-3/+3
|
* Build menus based on teh child-display propertyTed Gould2011-04-073-16/+49
|\
| * Make check to send about-to-show look for properties as well.Ted Gould2011-04-051-1/+1
| |
| * Attching a bug numberTed Gould2011-04-050-0/+0
| |
| * Making the debug message betterTed Gould2011-04-051-1/+1
| |
| * We don't need the parent, cut-and-paste confusion here.Ted Gould2011-04-051-6/+3
| |
| * Handle the case of the variant being NULLTed Gould2011-04-051-1/+4
| |
| * Now that we're using the child-display variable more, let's grab it in the ↵Ted Gould2011-04-051-3/+6
| | | | | | | | first pass.
| * Then menu should get created when processing the property, so let's warn and ↵Ted Gould2011-04-051-10/+5
| | | | | | | | exit here if it's not available
| * Passing in the client so that I can get the menuitem in all casesTed Gould2011-04-051-6/+19
| |
| * Setting up the shell to handle the children display propTed Gould2011-04-051-0/+22
| |
* | Add a handler for the open/close events and pass them up to GTKTed Gould2011-04-051-0/+38
|\ \
| * | respond to opened and closed events for the benefit of any watching applicationMichael Terry2011-04-051-0/+38
| |/
* | Keep refs to the client and makes sure to disconnect all handlers.Ted Gould2011-04-051-0/+5
|\ \
| * | fix typoMichael Terry2011-04-051-1/+1
| | |
| * | be a little more careful with asynchronous callbacksMichael Terry2011-04-051-0/+5
| |/
* | Don't duplicate flagsTed Gould2011-04-051-2/+0
|\ \ | |/ |/|
| * Don't need SCANNERFLAGS and INTROSPECTION_SCANNER_ARGS both so they dup'd ↵Ted Gould2011-04-041-2/+0
|/ | | | the parameters.
* 0.4.1Ted Gould2011-03-311-3/+3
|
* Ensuring that our iterators have variants to reference and ref'ing them ↵Ted Gould2011-03-312-6/+17
|\ | | | | | | correctly.
| * Be more specific about the shortcut typeTed Gould2011-03-291-1/+1
| |
| * Split out into another variableTed Gould2011-03-291-1/+4
| |
| * Use loop instead of nextTed Gould2011-03-281-3/+1
| |
| * Putting in some protections from NULL parameters.Ted Gould2011-03-281-0/+11
| |
| * Don't unref a variant we didn't have a ref to on errorTed Gould2011-03-281-1/+0
| |
* | Turning GTK Menuitems without labels into separators.Ted Gould2011-03-312-17/+83
|\ \ | |/ |/|
| * Remove some code duplication introduced in this branchChris Coulson2011-03-301-14/+13
| |
| * - Don't change the type of existing menu items in the server. ThisChris Coulson2011-03-301-12/+62
| | | | | | | | | | isn't handled in the client too well - Handle a GtkMenuItem's GtkLabel being removed too
| * Remove the now unneeded null pointer check on label in ↵Chris Coulson2011-03-301-17/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | construct_dbusmenu_for_widget. Also, don't use a strcmp in widget_notify_cb for checking if the menuitem is a separator. Just do a null pointer check on pdata->label instead
| * Revert the last commit and handle the same problem in the parser insteadChris Coulson2011-03-302-1/+22
| |
| * Don't set a default label for menuitems. Some applications (eg, xchat and ↵Chris Coulson2011-03-291-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | pidgin) do silly things like creating GtkMenuItems's without a label for separators (rather than using the GtkSeparatorMenuItem class). GTK correctly renders these as separators, so we need to handle it too by not setting a default label on these
* | Ensure the parent stays ref'dTed Gould2011-03-281-4/+5
|\ \
| * | fix some potential memory issues in hopes of fixing a reported crashMichael Terry2011-03-251-5/+6
| |/
* | Protect our properties parsing a bit more.Ted Gould2011-03-281-5/+23
|\ \ | |/ |/|
| * Attaching bugTed Gould2011-03-240-0/+0
| |
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-03-02 01:06:03 +0000