aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/nx-X11/extras/regex/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'nx-X11/extras/regex/tests')
-rw-r--r--nx-X11/extras/regex/tests477
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 477 deletions
diff --git a/nx-X11/extras/regex/tests b/nx-X11/extras/regex/tests
deleted file mode 100644
index e4d928dad..000000000
--- a/nx-X11/extras/regex/tests
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,477 +0,0 @@
-# regular expression test set
-# Lines are at least three fields, separated by one or more tabs. "" stands
-# for an empty field. First field is an RE. Second field is flags. If
-# C flag given, regcomp() is expected to fail, and the third field is the
-# error name (minus the leading REG_).
-#
-# Otherwise it is expected to succeed, and the third field is the string to
-# try matching it against. If there is no fourth field, the match is
-# expected to fail. If there is a fourth field, it is the substring that
-# the RE is expected to match. If there is a fifth field, it is a comma-
-# separated list of what the subexpressions should match, with - indicating
-# no match for that one. In both the fourth and fifth fields, a (sub)field
-# starting with @ indicates that the (sub)expression is expected to match
-# a null string followed by the stuff after the @; this provides a way to
-# test where null strings match. The character `N' in REs and strings
-# is newline, `S' is space, `T' is tab, `Z' is NUL.
-#
-# The full list of flags:
-# - placeholder, does nothing
-# b RE is a BRE, not an ERE
-# & try it as both an ERE and a BRE
-# C regcomp() error expected, third field is error name
-# i REG_ICASE
-# m ("mundane") REG_NOSPEC
-# s REG_NOSUB (not really testable)
-# n REG_NEWLINE
-# ^ REG_NOTBOL
-# $ REG_NOTEOL
-# # REG_STARTEND (see below)
-# p REG_PEND
-#
-# For REG_STARTEND, the start/end offsets are those of the substring
-# enclosed in ().
-
-# basics
-a & a a
-abc & abc abc
-abc|de - abc abc
-a|b|c - abc a
-
-# parentheses and perversions thereof
-a(b)c - abc abc
-a\(b\)c b abc abc
-a( C EPAREN
-a( b a( a(
-a\( - a( a(
-a\( bC EPAREN
-a\(b bC EPAREN
-a(b C EPAREN
-a(b b a(b a(b
-# gag me with a right parenthesis -- 1003.2 goofed here (my fault, partly)
-a) - a) a)
-) - ) )
-# end gagging (in a just world, those *should* give EPAREN)
-a) b a) a)
-a\) bC EPAREN
-\) bC EPAREN
-a()b - ab ab
-a\(\)b b ab ab
-
-# anchoring and REG_NEWLINE
-^abc$ & abc abc
-a^b - a^b
-a^b b a^b a^b
-a$b - a$b
-a$b b a$b a$b
-^ & abc @abc
-$ & abc @
-^$ & "" @
-$^ - "" @
-\($\)\(^\) b "" @
-# stop retching, those are legitimate (although disgusting)
-^^ - "" @
-$$ - "" @
-b$ & abNc
-b$ &n abNc b
-^b$ & aNbNc
-^b$ &n aNbNc b
-^$ &n aNNb @Nb
-^$ n abc
-^$ n abcN @
-$^ n aNNb @Nb
-\($\)\(^\) bn aNNb @Nb
-^^ n^ aNNb @Nb
-$$ n aNNb @NN
-^a ^ a
-a$ $ a
-^a ^n aNb
-^b ^n aNb b
-a$ $n bNa
-b$ $n bNa b
-a*(^b$)c* - b b
-a*\(^b$\)c* b b b
-
-# certain syntax errors and non-errors
-| C EMPTY
-| b | |
-* C BADRPT
-* b * *
-+ C BADRPT
-? C BADRPT
-"" &C EMPTY
-() - abc @abc
-\(\) b abc @abc
-a||b C EMPTY
-|ab C EMPTY
-ab| C EMPTY
-(|a)b C EMPTY
-(a|)b C EMPTY
-(*a) C BADRPT
-(+a) C BADRPT
-(?a) C BADRPT
-({1}a) C BADRPT
-\(\{1\}a\) bC BADRPT
-(a|*b) C BADRPT
-(a|+b) C BADRPT
-(a|?b) C BADRPT
-(a|{1}b) C BADRPT
-^* C BADRPT
-^* b * *
-^+ C BADRPT
-^? C BADRPT
-^{1} C BADRPT
-^\{1\} bC BADRPT
-
-# metacharacters, backslashes
-a.c & abc abc
-a[bc]d & abd abd
-a\*c & a*c a*c
-a\\b & a\b a\b
-a\\\*b & a\*b a\*b
-a\bc & abc abc
-a\ &C EESCAPE
-a\\bc & a\bc a\bc
-\{ bC BADRPT
-a\[b & a[b a[b
-a[b &C EBRACK
-# trailing $ is a peculiar special case for the BRE code
-a$ & a a
-a$ & a$
-a\$ & a
-a\$ & a$ a$
-a\\$ & a
-a\\$ & a$
-a\\$ & a\$
-a\\$ & a\ a\
-
-# back references, ugh
-a\(b\)\2c bC ESUBREG
-a\(b\1\)c bC ESUBREG
-a\(b*\)c\1d b abbcbbd abbcbbd bb
-a\(b*\)c\1d b abbcbd
-a\(b*\)c\1d b abbcbbbd
-^\(.\)\1 b abc
-a\([bc]\)\1d b abcdabbd abbd b
-a\(\([bc]\)\2\)*d b abbccd abbccd
-a\(\([bc]\)\2\)*d b abbcbd
-# actually, this next one probably ought to fail, but the spec is unclear
-a\(\(b\)*\2\)*d b abbbd abbbd
-# here is a case that no NFA implementation does right
-\(ab*\)[ab]*\1 b ababaaa ababaaa a
-# check out normal matching in the presence of back refs
-\(a\)\1bcd b aabcd aabcd
-\(a\)\1bc*d b aabcd aabcd
-\(a\)\1bc*d b aabd aabd
-\(a\)\1bc*d b aabcccd aabcccd
-\(a\)\1bc*[ce]d b aabcccd aabcccd
-^\(a\)\1b\(c\)*cd$ b aabcccd aabcccd
-
-# ordinary repetitions
-ab*c & abc abc
-ab+c - abc abc
-ab?c - abc abc
-a\(*\)b b a*b a*b
-a\(**\)b b ab ab
-a\(***\)b bC BADRPT
-*a b *a *a
-**a b a a
-***a bC BADRPT
-
-# the dreaded bounded repetitions
-{ & { {
-{abc & {abc {abc
-{1 C BADRPT
-{1} C BADRPT
-a{b & a{b a{b
-a{1}b - ab ab
-a\{1\}b b ab ab
-a{1,}b - ab ab
-a\{1,\}b b ab ab
-a{1,2}b - aab aab
-a\{1,2\}b b aab aab
-a{1 C EBRACE
-a\{1 bC EBRACE
-a{1a C EBRACE
-a\{1a bC EBRACE
-a{1a} C BADBR
-a\{1a\} bC BADBR
-a{,2} - a{,2} a{,2}
-a\{,2\} bC BADBR
-a{,} - a{,} a{,}
-a\{,\} bC BADBR
-a{1,x} C BADBR
-a\{1,x\} bC BADBR
-a{1,x C EBRACE
-a\{1,x bC EBRACE
-a{300} C BADBR
-a\{300\} bC BADBR
-a{1,0} C BADBR
-a\{1,0\} bC BADBR
-ab{0,0}c - abcac ac
-ab\{0,0\}c b abcac ac
-ab{0,1}c - abcac abc
-ab\{0,1\}c b abcac abc
-ab{0,3}c - abbcac abbc
-ab\{0,3\}c b abbcac abbc
-ab{1,1}c - acabc abc
-ab\{1,1\}c b acabc abc
-ab{1,3}c - acabc abc
-ab\{1,3\}c b acabc abc
-ab{2,2}c - abcabbc abbc
-ab\{2,2\}c b abcabbc abbc
-ab{2,4}c - abcabbc abbc
-ab\{2,4\}c b abcabbc abbc
-((a{1,10}){1,10}){1,10} - a a a,a
-
-# multiple repetitions
-a** &C BADRPT
-a++ C BADRPT
-a?? C BADRPT
-a*+ C BADRPT
-a*? C BADRPT
-a+* C BADRPT
-a+? C BADRPT
-a?* C BADRPT
-a?+ C BADRPT
-a{1}{1} C BADRPT
-a*{1} C BADRPT
-a+{1} C BADRPT
-a?{1} C BADRPT
-a{1}* C BADRPT
-a{1}+ C BADRPT
-a{1}? C BADRPT
-a*{b} - a{b} a{b}
-a\{1\}\{1\} bC BADRPT
-a*\{1\} bC BADRPT
-a\{1\}* bC BADRPT
-
-# brackets, and numerous perversions thereof
-a[b]c & abc abc
-a[ab]c & abc abc
-a[^ab]c & adc adc
-a[]b]c & a]c a]c
-a[[b]c & a[c a[c
-a[-b]c & a-c a-c
-a[^]b]c & adc adc
-a[^-b]c & adc adc
-a[b-]c & a-c a-c
-a[b &C EBRACK
-a[] &C EBRACK
-a[1-3]c & a2c a2c
-a[3-1]c &C ERANGE
-a[1-3-5]c &C ERANGE
-a[[.-.]--]c & a-c a-c
-a[1- &C ERANGE
-a[[. &C EBRACK
-a[[.x &C EBRACK
-a[[.x. &C EBRACK
-a[[.x.] &C EBRACK
-a[[.x.]] & ax ax
-a[[.x,.]] &C ECOLLATE
-a[[.one.]]b & a1b a1b
-a[[.notdef.]]b &C ECOLLATE
-a[[.].]]b & a]b a]b
-a[[:alpha:]]c & abc abc
-a[[:notdef:]]c &C ECTYPE
-a[[: &C EBRACK
-a[[:alpha &C EBRACK
-a[[:alpha:] &C EBRACK
-a[[:alpha,:] &C ECTYPE
-a[[:]:]]b &C ECTYPE
-a[[:-:]]b &C ECTYPE
-a[[:alph:]] &C ECTYPE
-a[[:alphabet:]] &C ECTYPE
-[[:alnum:]]+ - -%@a0X- a0X
-[[:alpha:]]+ - -%@aX0- aX
-[[:blank:]]+ - aSSTb SST
-[[:cntrl:]]+ - aNTb NT
-[[:digit:]]+ - a019b 019
-[[:graph:]]+ - Sa%bS a%b
-[[:lower:]]+ - AabC ab
-[[:print:]]+ - NaSbN aSb
-[[:punct:]]+ - S%-&T %-&
-[[:space:]]+ - aSNTb SNT
-[[:upper:]]+ - aBCd BC
-[[:xdigit:]]+ - p0f3Cq 0f3C
-a[[=b=]]c & abc abc
-a[[= &C EBRACK
-a[[=b &C EBRACK
-a[[=b= &C EBRACK
-a[[=b=] &C EBRACK
-a[[=b,=]] &C ECOLLATE
-a[[=one=]]b & a1b a1b
-
-# complexities
-a(((b)))c - abc abc
-a(b|(c))d - abd abd
-a(b*|c)d - abbd abbd
-# just gotta have one DFA-buster, of course
-a[ab]{20} - aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaab aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaab
-# and an inline expansion in case somebody gets tricky
-a[ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab] - aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaab aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaab
-# and in case somebody just slips in an NFA...
-a[ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab](wee|week)(knights|night) - aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaabweeknights aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaabweeknights
-# fish for anomalies as the number of states passes 32
-12345678901234567890123456789 - a12345678901234567890123456789b 12345678901234567890123456789
-123456789012345678901234567890 - a123456789012345678901234567890b 123456789012345678901234567890
-1234567890123456789012345678901 - a1234567890123456789012345678901b 1234567890123456789012345678901
-12345678901234567890123456789012 - a12345678901234567890123456789012b 12345678901234567890123456789012
-123456789012345678901234567890123 - a123456789012345678901234567890123b 123456789012345678901234567890123
-# and one really big one, beyond any plausible word width
-1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 - a1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890b 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
-# fish for problems as brackets go past 8
-[ab][cd][ef][gh][ij][kl][mn] - xacegikmoq acegikm
-[ab][cd][ef][gh][ij][kl][mn][op] - xacegikmoq acegikmo
-[ab][cd][ef][gh][ij][kl][mn][op][qr] - xacegikmoqy acegikmoq
-[ab][cd][ef][gh][ij][kl][mn][op][q] - xacegikmoqy acegikmoq
-
-# subtleties of matching
-abc & xabcy abc
-a\(b\)?c\1d b acd
-aBc i Abc Abc
-a[Bc]*d i abBCcd abBCcd
-0[[:upper:]]1 &i 0a1 0a1
-0[[:lower:]]1 &i 0A1 0A1
-a[^b]c &i abc
-a[^b]c &i aBc
-a[^b]c &i adc adc
-[a]b[c] - abc abc
-[a]b[a] - aba aba
-[abc]b[abc] - abc abc
-[abc]b[abd] - abd abd
-a(b?c)+d - accd accd
-(wee|week)(knights|night) - weeknights weeknights
-(we|wee|week|frob)(knights|night|day) - weeknights weeknights
-a[bc]d - xyzaaabcaababdacd abd
-a[ab]c - aaabc abc
-abc s abc abc
-a* & b @b
-
-# Let's have some fun -- try to match a C comment.
-# first the obvious, which looks okay at first glance...
-/\*.*\*/ - /*x*/ /*x*/
-# but...
-/\*.*\*/ - /*x*/y/*z*/ /*x*/y/*z*/
-# okay, we must not match */ inside; try to do that...
-/\*([^*]|\*[^/])*\*/ - /*x*/ /*x*/
-/\*([^*]|\*[^/])*\*/ - /*x*/y/*z*/ /*x*/
-# but...
-/\*([^*]|\*[^/])*\*/ - /*x**/y/*z*/ /*x**/y/*z*/
-# and a still fancier version, which does it right (I think)...
-/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x*/ /*x*/
-/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x*/y/*z*/ /*x*/
-/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x**/y/*z*/ /*x**/
-/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x****/y/*z*/ /*x****/
-/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x**x*/y/*z*/ /*x**x*/
-/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x***x/y/*z*/ /*x***x/y/*z*/
-
-# subexpressions
-.* - abc abc -
-a(b)(c)d - abcd abcd b,c
-a(((b)))c - abc abc b,b,b
-a(b|(c))d - abd abd b,-
-a(b*|c|e)d - abbd abbd bb
-a(b*|c|e)d - acd acd c
-a(b*|c|e)d - ad ad @d
-a(b?)c - abc abc b
-a(b?)c - ac ac @c
-a(b+)c - abc abc b
-a(b+)c - abbbc abbbc bbb
-a(b*)c - ac ac @c
-(a|ab)(bc([de]+)f|cde) - abcdef abcdef a,bcdef,de
-# the regression tester only asks for 9 subexpressions
-a(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)k - abcdefghijk abcdefghijk b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j
-a(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)l - abcdefghijkl abcdefghijkl b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k
-a([bc]?)c - abc abc b
-a([bc]?)c - ac ac @c
-a([bc]+)c - abc abc b
-a([bc]+)c - abcc abcc bc
-a([bc]+)bc - abcbc abcbc bc
-a(bb+|b)b - abb abb b
-a(bbb+|bb+|b)b - abb abb b
-a(bbb+|bb+|b)b - abbb abbb bb
-a(bbb+|bb+|b)bb - abbb abbb b
-(.*).* - abcdef abcdef abcdef
-(a*)* - bc @b @b
-
-# do we get the right subexpression when it is used more than once?
-a(b|c)*d - ad ad -
-a(b|c)*d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c)+d - abd abd b
-a(b|c)+d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c?)+d - ad ad @d
-a(b|c?)+d - abcd abcd @d
-a(b|c){0,0}d - ad ad -
-a(b|c){0,1}d - ad ad -
-a(b|c){0,1}d - abd abd b
-a(b|c){0,2}d - ad ad -
-a(b|c){0,2}d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c){0,}d - ad ad -
-a(b|c){0,}d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c){1,1}d - abd abd b
-a(b|c){1,1}d - acd acd c
-a(b|c){1,2}d - abd abd b
-a(b|c){1,2}d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c){1,}d - abd abd b
-a(b|c){1,}d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c){2,2}d - acbd acbd b
-a(b|c){2,2}d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c){2,4}d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c){2,4}d - abcbd abcbd b
-a(b|c){2,4}d - abcbcd abcbcd c
-a(b|c){2,}d - abcd abcd c
-a(b|c){2,}d - abcbd abcbd b
-a(b+|((c)*))+d - abd abd @d,@d,-
-a(b+|((c)*))+d - abcd abcd @d,@d,-
-
-# check out the STARTEND option
-[abc] &# a(b)c b
-[abc] &# a(d)c
-[abc] &# a(bc)d b
-[abc] &# a(dc)d c
-. &# a()c
-b.*c &# b(bc)c bc
-b.* &# b(bc)c bc
-.*c &# b(bc)c bc
-
-# plain strings, with the NOSPEC flag
-abc m abc abc
-abc m xabcy abc
-abc m xyz
-a*b m aba*b a*b
-a*b m ab
-"" mC EMPTY
-
-# cases involving NULs
-aZb & a a
-aZb &p a
-aZb &p# (aZb) aZb
-aZ*b &p# (ab) ab
-a.b &# (aZb) aZb
-a.* &# (aZb)c aZb
-
-# word boundaries (ick)
-[[:<:]]a & a a
-[[:<:]]a & ba
-[[:<:]]a & -a a
-a[[:>:]] & a a
-a[[:>:]] & ab
-a[[:>:]] & a- a
-[[:<:]]a.c[[:>:]] & axcd-dayc-dazce-abc abc
-[[:<:]]a.c[[:>:]] & axcd-dayc-dazce-abc-q abc
-[[:<:]]a.c[[:>:]] & axc-dayc-dazce-abc axc
-[[:<:]]b.c[[:>:]] & a_bxc-byc_d-bzc-q bzc
-[[:<:]].x..[[:>:]] & y_xa_-_xb_y-_xc_-axdc _xc_
-[[:<:]]a_b[[:>:]] & x_a_b
-
-# past problems, and suspected problems
-(A[1])|(A[2])|(A[3])|(A[4])|(A[5])|(A[6])|(A[7])|(A[8])|(A[9])|(A[A]) - A1 A1
-abcdefghijklmnop i abcdefghijklmnop abcdefghijklmnop
-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv i abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv
-(ALAK)|(ALT[AB])|(CC[123]1)|(CM[123]1)|(GAMC)|(LC[23][EO ])|(SEM[1234])|(SL[ES][12])|(SLWW)|(SLF )|(SLDT)|(VWH[12])|(WH[34][EW])|(WP1[ESN]) - CC11 CC11
-CC[13]1|a{21}[23][EO][123][Es][12]a{15}aa[34][EW]aaaaaaa[X]a - CC11 CC11
-Char \([a-z0-9_]*\)\[.* b Char xyz[k Char xyz[k xyz
-a?b - ab ab
--\{0,1\}[0-9]*$ b -5 -5
-a*a*a*a*a*a*a* & aaaaaa aaaaaa