Checked in the following released items:

xkeyboard-config-1.4.tar.gz
ttf-bitstream-vera-1.10.tar.gz
font-alias-1.0.1.tar.gz
font-sun-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-sun-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-sony-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-schumacher-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-mutt-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-misc-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-misc-meltho-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-micro-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-jis-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-isas-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-dec-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-daewoo-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-cursor-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-arabic-misc-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-winitzki-cyrillic-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-misc-cyrillic-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-cronyx-cyrillic-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-screen-cyrillic-1.0.1.tar.gz
font-xfree86-type1-1.0.1.tar.gz
font-adobe-utopia-type1-1.0.1.tar.gz
font-ibm-type1-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-bitstream-type1-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-bitstream-speedo-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-bh-ttf-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-bh-type1-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-bitstream-100dpi-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-bh-100dpi-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-adobe-utopia-100dpi-1.0.1.tar.gz
font-adobe-100dpi-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-util-1.0.1.tar.gz
font-bitstream-75dpi-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.0.tar.gz
font-adobe-utopia-75dpi-1.0.1.tar.gz
font-bh-75dpi-1.0.0.tar.gz
bdftopcf-1.0.1.tar.gz
font-adobe-75dpi-1.0.0.tar.gz
mkfontscale-1.0.6.tar.gz
openssl-0.9.8k.tar.gz
bigreqsproto-1.0.2.tar.gz
xtrans-1.2.2.tar.gz
resourceproto-1.0.2.tar.gz
inputproto-1.4.4.tar.gz
compositeproto-0.4.tar.gz
damageproto-1.1.0.tar.gz
zlib-1.2.3.tar.gz
xkbcomp-1.0.5.tar.gz
freetype-2.3.9.tar.gz
pthreads-w32-2-8-0-release.tar.gz
pixman-0.12.0.tar.gz
kbproto-1.0.3.tar.gz
evieext-1.0.2.tar.gz
fixesproto-4.0.tar.gz
recordproto-1.13.2.tar.gz
randrproto-1.2.2.tar.gz
scrnsaverproto-1.1.0.tar.gz
renderproto-0.9.3.tar.gz
xcmiscproto-1.1.2.tar.gz
fontsproto-2.0.2.tar.gz
xextproto-7.0.3.tar.gz
xproto-7.0.14.tar.gz
libXdmcp-1.0.2.tar.gz
libxkbfile-1.0.5.tar.gz
libfontenc-1.0.4.tar.gz
libXfont-1.3.4.tar.gz
libX11-1.1.5.tar.gz
libXau-1.0.4.tar.gz
libxcb-1.1.tar.gz
xorg-server-1.5.3.tar.gz

1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/openssl/crypto/des/options.txt b/openssl/crypto/des/options.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6e2b50f76
--- /dev/null
+++ b/openssl/crypto/des/options.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+Note that the UNROLL option makes the 'inner' des loop unroll all 16 rounds
+instead of the default 4.
+RISC1 and RISC2 are 2 alternatives for the inner loop and
+PTR means to use pointers arithmatic instead of arrays.
+
+FreeBSD - Pentium Pro 200mhz - gcc 2.7.2.2 - assembler		577,000 4620k/s
+IRIX 6.2 - R10000 195mhz - cc (-O3 -n32) - UNROLL RISC2 PTR	496,000 3968k/s
+solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 - UNROLL RISC1 PTR [1]	459,400 3672k/s
+FreeBSD - Pentium Pro 200mhz - gcc 2.7.2.2 - UNROLL RISC1	433,000 3468k/s
+solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - gcc 2.7.2 - UNROLL 		380,000 3041k/s
+linux - pentium 100mhz - gcc 2.7.0 - assembler			281,000 2250k/s
+NT 4.0 - pentium 100mhz - VC 4.2 - assembler			281,000 2250k/s
+AIX 4.1? - PPC604 100mhz - cc - UNROLL 				275,000 2200k/s
+IRIX 5.3 - R4400 200mhz - gcc 2.6.3 - UNROLL RISC2 PTR		235,300 1882k/s
+IRIX 5.3 - R4400 200mhz - cc - UNROLL RISC2 PTR			233,700 1869k/s
+NT 4.0 - pentium 100mhz - VC 4.2 - UNROLL RISC1 PTR		191,000 1528k/s
+DEC Alpha 165mhz??  - cc - RISC2 PTR [2]			181,000 1448k/s
+linux - pentium 100mhz - gcc 2.7.0 - UNROLL RISC1 PTR		158,500 1268k/s
+HPUX 10 - 9000/887 - cc - UNROLL [3]	 			148,000	1190k/s
+solaris 2.5.1 - sparc 10 50mhz - gcc 2.7.2 - UNROLL		123,600  989k/s
+IRIX 5.3 - R4000 100mhz - cc - UNROLL RISC2 PTR			101,000  808k/s
+DGUX - 88100 50mhz(?) - gcc 2.6.3 - UNROLL			 81,000  648k/s
+solaris 2.4 486 50mhz - gcc 2.6.3 - assembler			 65,000  522k/s
+HPUX 10 - 9000/887 - k&r cc (default compiler) - UNROLL PTR	 76,000	 608k/s
+solaris 2.4 486 50mhz - gcc 2.6.3 - UNROLL RISC2		 43,500  344k/s
+AIX - old slow one :-) - cc -					 39,000  312k/s
+
+Notes.
+[1] For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 
+    cc -xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8plus -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
+    gives a speed of 344,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 459,000 des/s.
+    I'll record the higher since it is coming from the library but it
+    is all rather weird.
+[2] Similar to the ultra sparc ([1]), 181,000 for 'des_opts' vs 175,000.
+[3] I was unable to get access to this machine when it was not heavily loaded.
+    As such, my timing program was never able to get more that %30 of the CPU.
+    This would cause the program to give much lower speed numbers because
+    it would be 'fighting' to stay in the cache with the other CPU burning
+    processes.