Updated to openssl 1.0.0

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 159 deletions

diff --git a/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-ia64.S b/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-ia64.S
deleted file mode 100644
index 8210c47d0..000000000
--- a/openssl/crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-ia64.S
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,159 +0,0 @@
-// ====================================================================
-// Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se> for the OpenSSL
-// project.
-//
-// Rights for redistribution and usage in source and binary forms are
-// granted according to the OpenSSL license. Warranty of any kind is
-// disclaimed.
-// ====================================================================
-
-.ident  "rc4-ia64.S, Version 2.0"
-.ident  "IA-64 ISA artwork by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se>"
-
-// What's wrong with compiler generated code? Because of the nature of
-// C language, compiler doesn't [dare to] reorder load and stores. But
-// being memory-bound, RC4 should benefit from reorder [on in-order-
-// execution core such as IA-64]. But what can we reorder? At the very
-// least we can safely reorder references to key schedule in respect
-// to input and output streams. Secondly, from the first [close] glance
-// it appeared that it's possible to pull up some references to
-// elements of the key schedule itself. Original rationale ["prior
-// loads are not safe only for "degenerated" key schedule, when some
-// elements equal to the same value"] was kind of sloppy. I should have
-// formulated as it really was: if we assume that pulling up reference
-// to key[x+1] is not safe, then it would mean that key schedule would
-// "degenerate," which is never the case. The problem is that this
-// holds true in respect to references to key[x], but not to key[y].
-// Legitimate "collisions" do occur within every 256^2 bytes window.
-// Fortunately there're enough free instruction slots to keep prior
-// reference to key[x+1], detect "collision" and compensate for it.
-// All this without sacrificing a single clock cycle:-) Throughput is
-// ~210MBps on 900MHz CPU, which is is >3x faster than gcc generated
-// code and +30% - if compared to HP-UX C. Unrolling loop below should
-// give >30% on top of that...
-
-.text
-.explicit
-
-#if defined(_HPUX_SOURCE) && !defined(_LP64)
-# define ADDP	addp4
-#else
-# define ADDP	add
-#endif
-
-#ifndef SZ
-#define SZ	4	// this is set to sizeof(RC4_INT)
-#endif
-// SZ==4 seems to be optimal. At least SZ==8 is not any faster, not for
-// assembler implementation, while SZ==1 code is ~30% slower.
-#if SZ==1	// RC4_INT is unsigned char
-# define	LDKEY	ld1
-# define	STKEY	st1
-# define	OFF	0
-#elif SZ==4	// RC4_INT is unsigned int
-# define	LDKEY	ld4
-# define	STKEY	st4
-# define	OFF	2
-#elif SZ==8	// RC4_INT is unsigned long
-# define	LDKEY	ld8
-# define	STKEY	st8
-# define	OFF	3
-#endif
-
-out=r8;		// [expanded] output pointer
-inp=r9;		// [expanded] output pointer
-prsave=r10;
-key=r28;	// [expanded] pointer to RC4_KEY
-ksch=r29;	// (key->data+255)[&~(sizeof(key->data)-1)]
-xx=r30;
-yy=r31;
-
-// void RC4(RC4_KEY *key,size_t len,const void *inp,void *out);
-.global	RC4#
-.proc	RC4#
-.align	32
-.skip	16
-RC4:
-	.prologue
-	.save   ar.pfs,r2
-{ .mii;	alloc	r2=ar.pfs,4,12,0,16
-	.save	pr,prsave
-	mov	prsave=pr
-	ADDP	key=0,in0		};;
-{ .mib;	cmp.eq	p6,p0=0,in1			// len==0?
-	.save	ar.lc,r3
-	mov	r3=ar.lc
-(p6)	br.ret.spnt.many	b0	};;	// emergency exit
-
-	.body
-	.rotr	dat[4],key_x[4],tx[2],rnd[2],key_y[2],ty[1];
-
-{ .mib;	LDKEY	xx=[key],SZ			// load key->x
-	add	in1=-1,in1			// adjust len for loop counter
-	nop.b	0			}
-{ .mib;	ADDP	inp=0,in2
-	ADDP	out=0,in3
-	brp.loop.imp	.Ltop,.Lexit-16	};;
-{ .mmi;	LDKEY	yy=[key]			// load key->y
-	add	ksch=SZ,key
-	mov	ar.lc=in1		}
-{ .mmi;	mov	key_y[1]=r0			// guarantee inequality
-						// in first iteration
-	add	xx=1,xx
-	mov	pr.rot=1<<16		};;
-{ .mii;	nop.m	0
-	dep	key_x[1]=xx,r0,OFF,8
-	mov	ar.ec=3			};;	// note that epilogue counter
-						// is off by 1. I compensate
-						// for this at exit...
-.Ltop:
-// The loop is scheduled for 4*(n+2) spin-rate on Itanium 2, which
-// theoretically gives asymptotic performance of clock frequency
-// divided by 4 bytes per seconds, or 400MBps on 1.6GHz CPU. This is
-// for sizeof(RC4_INT)==4. For smaller RC4_INT STKEY inadvertently
-// splits the last bundle and you end up with 5*n spin-rate:-(
-// Originally the loop was scheduled for 3*n and relied on key
-// schedule to be aligned at 256*sizeof(RC4_INT) boundary. But
-// *(out++)=dat, which maps to st1, had same effect [inadvertent
-// bundle split] and holded the loop back. Rescheduling for 4*n
-// made it possible to eliminate dependence on specific alignment
-// and allow OpenSSH keep "abusing" our API. Reaching for 3*n would
-// require unrolling, sticking to variable shift instruction for
-// collecting output [to avoid starvation for integer shifter] and
-// copying of key schedule to controlled place in stack [so that
-// deposit instruction can serve as substitute for whole
-// key->data+((x&255)<<log2(sizeof(key->data[0])))]...
-{ .mmi;	(p19)	st1	[out]=dat[3],1			// *(out++)=dat
-	(p16)	add	xx=1,xx				// x++
-	(p18)	dep	rnd[1]=rnd[1],r0,OFF,8	}	// ((tx+ty)&255)<<OFF
-{ .mmi;	(p16)	add	key_x[1]=ksch,key_x[1]		// &key[xx&255]
-	(p17)	add	key_y[1]=ksch,key_y[1]	};;	// &key[yy&255]	
-{ .mmi;	(p16)	LDKEY	tx[0]=[key_x[1]]		// tx=key[xx]
-	(p17)	LDKEY	ty[0]=[key_y[1]]		// ty=key[yy]	
-	(p16)	dep	key_x[0]=xx,r0,OFF,8	}	// (xx&255)<<OFF
-{ .mmi;	(p18)	add	rnd[1]=ksch,rnd[1]		// &key[(tx+ty)&255]
-	(p16)	cmp.ne.unc p20,p21=key_x[1],key_y[1] };;
-{ .mmi;	(p18)	LDKEY	rnd[1]=[rnd[1]]			// rnd=key[(tx+ty)&255]
-	(p16)	ld1	dat[0]=[inp],1		}	// dat=*(inp++)
-.pred.rel	"mutex",p20,p21
-{ .mmi;	(p21)	add	yy=yy,tx[1]			// (p16)
-	(p20)	add	yy=yy,tx[0]			// (p16) y+=tx
-	(p21)	mov	tx[0]=tx[1]		};;	// (p16)
-{ .mmi;	(p17)	STKEY	[key_y[1]]=tx[1]		// key[yy]=tx
-	(p17)	STKEY	[key_x[2]]=ty[0]		// key[xx]=ty
-	(p16)	dep	key_y[0]=yy,r0,OFF,8	}	// &key[yy&255]
-{ .mmb;	(p17)	add	rnd[0]=tx[1],ty[0]		// tx+=ty
-	(p18)	xor	dat[2]=dat[2],rnd[1]		// dat^=rnd
-	br.ctop.sptk	.Ltop			};;
-.Lexit:
-{ .mib;	STKEY	[key]=yy,-SZ			// save key->y
-	mov	pr=prsave,0x1ffff
-	nop.b	0			}
-{ .mib;	st1	[out]=dat[3],1			// compensate for truncated
-						// epilogue counter
-	add	xx=-1,xx
-	nop.b	0			};;
-{ .mib;	STKEY	[key]=xx			// save key->x
-	mov	ar.lc=r3
-	br.ret.sptk.many	b0	};;
-.endp	RC4#