Updated to openssl-1.0.0c

6 files changed, 75 insertions, 69 deletions

diff --git a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-armv4-large.pl b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-armv4-large.pl
index 88861af64..6e65fe3e0 100644
--- a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-armv4-large.pl
+++ b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-armv4-large.pl
@@ -37,9 +37,18 @@
 #	modes are limited. As result it takes more instructions to do
 #	the same job in Thumb, therefore the code is never twice as
 #	small and always slower.
-# [***]	which is also ~35% better than compiler generated code.
+# [***]	which is also ~35% better than compiler generated code. Dual-
+#	issue Cortex A8 core was measured to process input block in
+#	~990 cycles.
 
-$output=shift;
+# August 2010.
+#
+# Rescheduling for dual-issue pipeline resulted in 13% improvement on
+# Cortex A8 core and in absolute terms ~870 cycles per input block
+# [or 13.6 cycles per byte].
+
+
+while (($output=shift) && ($output!~/^\w[\w\-]*\.\w+$/)) {}
 open STDOUT,">$output";
 
 $ctx="r0";
@@ -58,43 +67,22 @@ $t3="r12";
 $Xi="r14";
 @V=($a,$b,$c,$d,$e);
 
-# One can optimize this for aligned access on big-endian architecture,
-# but code's endian neutrality makes it too pretty:-)
-sub Xload {
-my ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-$code.=<<___;
-	ldrb	$t0,[$inp],#4
-	ldrb	$t1,[$inp,#-3]
-	ldrb	$t2,[$inp,#-2]
-	ldrb	$t3,[$inp,#-1]
-	add	$e,$K,$e,ror#2			@ E+=K_00_19
-	orr	$t0,$t1,$t0,lsl#8
-	add	$e,$e,$a,ror#27			@ E+=ROR(A,27)
-	orr	$t0,$t2,$t0,lsl#8
-	eor	$t1,$c,$d			@ F_xx_xx
-	orr	$t0,$t3,$t0,lsl#8
-	add	$e,$e,$t0			@ E+=X[i]
-	str	$t0,[$Xi,#-4]!
-___
-}
 sub Xupdate {
-my ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e,$flag)=@_;
+my ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e,$opt1,$opt2)=@_;
 $code.=<<___;
 	ldr	$t0,[$Xi,#15*4]
 	ldr	$t1,[$Xi,#13*4]
 	ldr	$t2,[$Xi,#7*4]
-	ldr	$t3,[$Xi,#2*4]
 	add	$e,$K,$e,ror#2			@ E+=K_xx_xx
+	ldr	$t3,[$Xi,#2*4]
 	eor	$t0,$t0,$t1
-	eor	$t0,$t0,$t2
-	eor	$t0,$t0,$t3
-	add	$e,$e,$a,ror#27			@ E+=ROR(A,27)
-___
-$code.=<<___ if (!defined($flag));
-	eor	$t1,$c,$d			@ F_xx_xx, but not in 40_59
-___
-$code.=<<___;
+	eor	$t2,$t2,$t3
+	eor	$t1,$c,$d			@ F_xx_xx
 	mov	$t0,$t0,ror#31
+	add	$e,$e,$a,ror#27			@ E+=ROR(A,27)
+	eor	$t0,$t0,$t2,ror#31
+	$opt1					@ F_xx_xx
+	$opt2					@ F_xx_xx
 	add	$e,$e,$t0			@ E+=X[i]
 	str	$t0,[$Xi,#-4]!
 ___
@@ -102,19 +90,29 @@ ___
 
 sub BODY_00_15 {
 my ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-	&Xload(@_);
 $code.=<<___;
+	ldrb	$t0,[$inp],#4
+	ldrb	$t1,[$inp,#-1]
+	ldrb	$t2,[$inp,#-2]
+	add	$e,$K,$e,ror#2			@ E+=K_00_19
+	ldrb	$t3,[$inp,#-3]
+	add	$e,$e,$a,ror#27			@ E+=ROR(A,27)
+	orr	$t0,$t1,$t0,lsl#24
+	eor	$t1,$c,$d			@ F_xx_xx
+	orr	$t0,$t0,$t2,lsl#8
+	orr	$t0,$t0,$t3,lsl#16
 	and	$t1,$b,$t1,ror#2
+	add	$e,$e,$t0			@ E+=X[i]
 	eor	$t1,$t1,$d,ror#2		@ F_00_19(B,C,D)
+	str	$t0,[$Xi,#-4]!
 	add	$e,$e,$t1			@ E+=F_00_19(B,C,D)
 ___
 }
 
 sub BODY_16_19 {
 my ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-	&Xupdate(@_);
+	&Xupdate(@_,"and $t1,$b,$t1,ror#2");
 $code.=<<___;
-	and	$t1,$b,$t1,ror#2
 	eor	$t1,$t1,$d,ror#2		@ F_00_19(B,C,D)
 	add	$e,$e,$t1			@ E+=F_00_19(B,C,D)
 ___
@@ -122,22 +120,18 @@ ___
 
 sub BODY_20_39 {
 my ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-	&Xupdate(@_);
+	&Xupdate(@_,"eor $t1,$b,$t1,ror#2");
 $code.=<<___;
-	eor	$t1,$b,$t1,ror#2		@ F_20_39(B,C,D)
 	add	$e,$e,$t1			@ E+=F_20_39(B,C,D)
 ___
 }
 
 sub BODY_40_59 {
 my ($a,$b,$c,$d,$e)=@_;
-	&Xupdate(@_,1);
+	&Xupdate(@_,"and $t1,$b,$t1,ror#2","and $t2,$c,$d");
 $code.=<<___;
-	and	$t1,$b,$c,ror#2
-	orr	$t2,$b,$c,ror#2
-	and	$t2,$t2,$d,ror#2
-	orr	$t1,$t1,$t2			@ F_40_59(B,C,D)
 	add	$e,$e,$t1			@ E+=F_40_59(B,C,D)
+	add	$e,$e,$t2,ror#2
 ___
 }
 
diff --git a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl
index 8306fc88c..5c161cecd 100644
--- a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl
+++ b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9.pl
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ $code.=<<___;
 .type	sha1_block_data_order,#function
 .size	sha1_block_data_order,(.-sha1_block_data_order)
 .asciz	"SHA1 block transform for SPARCv9, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"
+.align	4
 ___
 
 $code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem;
diff --git a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl
index 15eb854ba..85e8d6808 100644
--- a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl
+++ b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-sparcv9a.pl
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ $code.=<<___;
 .type	sha1_block_data_order,#function
 .size	sha1_block_data_order,(.-sha1_block_data_order)
 .asciz	"SHA1 block transform for SPARCv9a, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"
+.align	4
 ___
 
 # Purpose of these subroutines is to explicitly encode VIS instructions,
diff --git a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha256-armv4.pl b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha256-armv4.pl
index 48d846dee..492cb62bc 100644
--- a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha256-armv4.pl
+++ b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha256-armv4.pl
@@ -11,9 +11,14 @@
 
 # Performance is ~2x better than gcc 3.4 generated code and in "abso-
 # lute" terms is ~2250 cycles per 64-byte block or ~35 cycles per
-# byte.
+# byte [on single-issue Xscale PXA250 core].
 
-$output=shift;
+# July 2010.
+#
+# Rescheduling for dual-issue pipeline resulted in 22% improvement on
+# Cortex A8 core and ~20 cycles per processed byte.
+
+while (($output=shift) && ($output!~/^\w[\w\-]*\.\w+$/)) {}
 open STDOUT,">$output";
 
 $ctx="r0";	$t0="r0";
@@ -52,27 +57,27 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($i<16);
 ___
 $code.=<<___;
 	ldr	$t2,[$Ktbl],#4			@ *K256++
-	str	$T1,[sp,#`$i%16`*4]
 	mov	$t0,$e,ror#$Sigma1[0]
+	str	$T1,[sp,#`$i%16`*4]
 	eor	$t0,$t0,$e,ror#$Sigma1[1]
-	eor	$t0,$t0,$e,ror#$Sigma1[2]	@ Sigma1(e)
-	add	$T1,$T1,$t0
 	eor	$t1,$f,$g
+	eor	$t0,$t0,$e,ror#$Sigma1[2]	@ Sigma1(e)
 	and	$t1,$t1,$e
+	add	$T1,$T1,$t0
 	eor	$t1,$t1,$g			@ Ch(e,f,g)
-	add	$T1,$T1,$t1
 	add	$T1,$T1,$h
-	add	$T1,$T1,$t2
 	mov	$h,$a,ror#$Sigma0[0]
+	add	$T1,$T1,$t1
 	eor	$h,$h,$a,ror#$Sigma0[1]
+	add	$T1,$T1,$t2
 	eor	$h,$h,$a,ror#$Sigma0[2]		@ Sigma0(a)
 	orr	$t0,$a,$b
-	and	$t0,$t0,$c
 	and	$t1,$a,$b
+	and	$t0,$t0,$c
+	add	$h,$h,$T1
 	orr	$t0,$t0,$t1			@ Maj(a,b,c)
-	add	$h,$h,$t0
 	add	$d,$d,$T1
-	add	$h,$h,$T1
+	add	$h,$h,$t0
 ___
 }
 
@@ -80,19 +85,19 @@ sub BODY_16_XX {
 my ($i,$a,$b,$c,$d,$e,$f,$g,$h) = @_;
 
 $code.=<<___;
-	ldr	$t1,[sp,#`($i+1)%16`*4]	@ $i
+	ldr	$t1,[sp,#`($i+1)%16`*4]		@ $i
 	ldr	$t2,[sp,#`($i+14)%16`*4]
 	ldr	$T1,[sp,#`($i+0)%16`*4]
-	ldr	$inp,[sp,#`($i+9)%16`*4]
 	mov	$t0,$t1,ror#$sigma0[0]
+	ldr	$inp,[sp,#`($i+9)%16`*4]
 	eor	$t0,$t0,$t1,ror#$sigma0[1]
 	eor	$t0,$t0,$t1,lsr#$sigma0[2]	@ sigma0(X[i+1])
 	mov	$t1,$t2,ror#$sigma1[0]
+	add	$T1,$T1,$t0
 	eor	$t1,$t1,$t2,ror#$sigma1[1]
+	add	$T1,$T1,$inp
 	eor	$t1,$t1,$t2,lsr#$sigma1[2]	@ sigma1(X[i+14])
-	add	$T1,$T1,$t0
 	add	$T1,$T1,$t1
-	add	$T1,$T1,$inp
 ___
 	&BODY_00_15(@_);
 }
diff --git a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha512-armv4.pl b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha512-armv4.pl
index 4fbb94a91..3a35861ac 100644
--- a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha512-armv4.pl
+++ b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha512-armv4.pl
@@ -10,7 +10,13 @@
 # SHA512 block procedure for ARMv4. September 2007.
 
 # This code is ~4.5 (four and a half) times faster than code generated
-# by gcc 3.4 and it spends ~72 clock cycles per byte. 
+# by gcc 3.4 and it spends ~72 clock cycles per byte [on single-issue
+# Xscale PXA250 core].
+#
+# July 2010.
+#
+# Rescheduling for dual-issue pipeline resulted in 6% improvement on
+# Cortex A8 core and ~40 cycles per processed byte.
 
 # Byte order [in]dependence. =========================================
 #
@@ -22,7 +28,7 @@ $hi=0;
 $lo=4;
 # ====================================================================
 
-$output=shift;
+while (($output=shift) && ($output!~/^\w[\w\-]*\.\w+$/)) {}
 open STDOUT,">$output";
 
 $ctx="r0";
@@ -73,33 +79,31 @@ $code.=<<___;
 	eor	$t0,$t0,$Elo,lsl#23
 	eor	$t1,$t1,$Ehi,lsl#23	@ Sigma1(e)
 	adds	$Tlo,$Tlo,$t0
-	adc	$Thi,$Thi,$t1		@ T += Sigma1(e)
-	adds	$Tlo,$Tlo,$t2
-	adc	$Thi,$Thi,$t3		@ T += h
-
 	ldr	$t0,[sp,#$Foff+0]	@ f.lo
+	adc	$Thi,$Thi,$t1		@ T += Sigma1(e)
 	ldr	$t1,[sp,#$Foff+4]	@ f.hi
+	adds	$Tlo,$Tlo,$t2
 	ldr	$t2,[sp,#$Goff+0]	@ g.lo
+	adc	$Thi,$Thi,$t3		@ T += h
 	ldr	$t3,[sp,#$Goff+4]	@ g.hi
-	str	$Elo,[sp,#$Eoff+0]
-	str	$Ehi,[sp,#$Eoff+4]
-	str	$Alo,[sp,#$Aoff+0]
-	str	$Ahi,[sp,#$Aoff+4]
 
 	eor	$t0,$t0,$t2
+	str	$Elo,[sp,#$Eoff+0]
 	eor	$t1,$t1,$t3
+	str	$Ehi,[sp,#$Eoff+4]
 	and	$t0,$t0,$Elo
+	str	$Alo,[sp,#$Aoff+0]
 	and	$t1,$t1,$Ehi
+	str	$Ahi,[sp,#$Aoff+4]
 	eor	$t0,$t0,$t2
-	eor	$t1,$t1,$t3		@ Ch(e,f,g)
-
 	ldr	$t2,[$Ktbl,#4]		@ K[i].lo
+	eor	$t1,$t1,$t3		@ Ch(e,f,g)
 	ldr	$t3,[$Ktbl,#0]		@ K[i].hi
-	ldr	$Elo,[sp,#$Doff+0]	@ d.lo
-	ldr	$Ehi,[sp,#$Doff+4]	@ d.hi
 
 	adds	$Tlo,$Tlo,$t0
+	ldr	$Elo,[sp,#$Doff+0]	@ d.lo
 	adc	$Thi,$Thi,$t1		@ T += Ch(e,f,g)
+	ldr	$Ehi,[sp,#$Doff+4]	@ d.hi
 	adds	$Tlo,$Tlo,$t2
 	adc	$Thi,$Thi,$t3		@ T += K[i]
 	adds	$Elo,$Elo,$Tlo
diff --git a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha512-sparcv9.pl b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha512-sparcv9.pl
index 54241aab5..ec5d78135 100644
--- a/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha512-sparcv9.pl
+++ b/openssl/crypto/sha/asm/sha512-sparcv9.pl
@@ -586,6 +586,7 @@ $code.=<<___;
 .type	sha${label}_block_data_order,#function
 .size	sha${label}_block_data_order,(.-sha${label}_block_data_order)
 .asciz	"SHA${label} block transform for SPARCv9, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"
+.align	4
 ___
 
 $code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem;