From d8e3f99cdf46297afeb26fe15ad30f7c6de8ee7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: marha Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:30:47 +0200 Subject: Switched to freetype 2.4.5 --- freetype/docs/PROBLEMS | 15 ++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'freetype/docs/PROBLEMS') diff --git a/freetype/docs/PROBLEMS b/freetype/docs/PROBLEMS index 9b598966a..40bdc35a6 100644 --- a/freetype/docs/PROBLEMS +++ b/freetype/docs/PROBLEMS @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Running Problems ----- Of course, there might be bugs in FreeType, but some fonts based on -the PostScript format can't behandled indeed. The reason is that +the PostScript format can't be handled indeed. The reason is that FreeType doesn't contain a full PostScript interpreter but applies pattern matching instead. In case a font doesn't follow the standard structure of the given font format, FreeType fails. A typical example @@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ It might be possible to patch FreeType in some situations, though. Please report failing fonts so that we investigate the problem and set up a list of such problematic fonts. + +* Why do identical FreeType versions render differently on different + platforms? + +----- + +Different distributions compile FreeType with different options. The +developer version of a distribution's FreeType package, which is +needed to compile your program against FreeType, includes the file +ftoption.h. Compare each platform's copy of ftoption.h to find the +differences. + + ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- cgit v1.2.3