From d8e3f99cdf46297afeb26fe15ad30f7c6de8ee7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marha <marha@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:30:47 +0200
Subject: Switched to freetype 2.4.5

---
 freetype/docs/PROBLEMS | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'freetype/docs/PROBLEMS')

diff --git a/freetype/docs/PROBLEMS b/freetype/docs/PROBLEMS
index 9b598966a..40bdc35a6 100644
--- a/freetype/docs/PROBLEMS
+++ b/freetype/docs/PROBLEMS
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Running Problems
 -----
 
 Of course,  there might be  bugs in FreeType,  but some fonts based on
-the  PostScript  format can't  behandled indeed.  The  reason  is that
+the  PostScript  format can't  be handled indeed.  The reason  is that
 FreeType  doesn't contain a full  PostScript  interpreter  but applies
 pattern matching instead.  In case a font doesn't follow the  standard
 structure of the given font format, FreeType fails.  A typical example
@@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ It might be  possible to patch  FreeType in  some situations,  though.
 Please report failing fonts so that we investigate the problem and set
 up a list of such problematic fonts.
 
+
+* Why do identical FreeType  versions render differently  on different
+  platforms?
+
+-----
+
+Different distributions compile FreeType with different options.   The
+developer  version of  a  distribution's  FreeType  package,  which is
+needed to compile  your program  against FreeType,  includes the  file
+ftoption.h.  Compare  each platform's  copy of ftoption.h to  find the
+differences.
+
+
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3