abstracted the mpris handling to accomodate the messy integration issues

1 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/mpris-bridge.vala b/src/mpris-bridge.vala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..682069c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/mpris-bridge.vala
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+public class MprisBridge : GLib.Object
+{
+	private MprisController mpris1_controller;
+	private Mpris2Controller mpris2_controller;	
+	private enum mode{
+		MPRIS_1,
+		MPRIS_2
+	}
+	private mode mode_in_use;
+	
+	public MprisBridge(PlayerController ctrl)
+	{
+		this.mpris2_controller == new Mpris2Controller(ctrl);
+		if(this.mpris2_controller.was_successfull() == true){
+			mode_in_use == mode.MPRIS_2;
+			this.mpris1_controller == null;
+			this.mpris2_controller.initial_update();
+		}
+		else{
+			delete this.mpris2_controller;
+			this.mpris2_controller == null;
+			mode_in_use == mode.MPRIS_1;
+			this.mpris1_controller = new Mpris1Controller(ctrl);
+		}
+	}
+	
+	// The handling of both mpris controllers can be abstracted further 
+	// once the mpris2 is implemented. This will allow for one instance
+	// variable to point at the active controller. For now handle both ...  
+	public bool connected()
+	{
+		if(this.mode_in_use == mode.MPRIS_1){
+			return this.mpris1_controller.connected();			
+		}
+		else if(this.mode_in_use == mode.MPRIS_2){
+			return this.mpris2_controller.connected();			
+		}
+		return false;
+	}
+	
+	public void transport_update(TransportMenuitem.action update)
+	{
+		if(this.mode_in_use == mode.MPRIS_1){
+			this.mpris1_controller.transport_event(update);
+		}
+		else if(this.mode_in_use == mode.MPRIS_2){
+			this.mpris2_controller.transport_event(update);
+		}
+	}
+
+	public void set_track_position(double pos)
+	{
+		if(this.mode_in_use == mode.MPRIS_1){
+			this.mpris1_controller.set_position(pos);
+		}
+		else if(this.mode_in_use == mode.MPRIS_2){
+			this.mpris2_controller.set_position(pos);
+		}
+	}	
+}
\ No newline at end of file